Channel 4 defended against n**ed.n**ed Attraction criticism amid privatisation changes: ‘It’s a cultural jewel’
Posted by  badge Boss on Apr 05, 2022 - 08:41PM
Fans of n**ed.n**ed Attraction don’t want it to be axed (Picture: Rachel Joseph)

viewers are defending the network and some of its most popular shows amid conversations of privatisation.

n**ed.n**ed Attraction – hosted by – in particular has been defended, with fans condemning government plans to sell the channel.

Controversial plans have been discussed for the last few months, but the government has come to the decision to , with the move being announced on Tuesday. 

It’s said this is in order to secure long-term funding for Channel 4 as streaming giants – such as  Prime and Netflix – continue to grow in popularity. 

The matter has not been met with full support, with well-known TV stars, such as Kirstie Allsopp – criticising it.

Jumping to the defence of shows like n**ed.n**ed Attraction – in which contestants aim to find a romantic partner by ‘dating in reverse’ and showing their completely nude bodies – viewers said the unconventional dating show belongs on Channel 4.

‘n**ed.n**ed attraction is the best TV show on Channel 4 love it,’ said an avid viewer.

Another branded n**ed.n**ed Attraction as ‘a cultural jewel.’

However, not everyone cares so much if the racy dating show is axed, with one calling it ‘dreadful.’

A second said the network has become ‘too salacious’ with programmes like n**ed.n**ed Attraction.

Backing the show’s diversity and forward-thinking, though, a Twitter user wrote: ‘Channel 4’s remit say they should make programmes that “appeal to the tastes and interests of a culturally diverse society.” They’re going to make stuff you HATE. Just like every other bloody channel!’

Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries wants the channel to remain a ‘cherished place in British life’ (Picture: PA)

The broadcaster – which was founded in 1982 – is owned by the government currently but, unlike the BBC, it receives funding from advertising.

Privatising it would mean prioritising profits, rather than the content it provides for audiences.

It would end the broadcaster’s special model of relying on independent production companies to make programmes, and reinvesting profits in new shows. 

The change would also mean Channel 4 would end up with no legislative duty to nurture new talent or reflect diversity in the UK. 

A petition is currently live for the public to sign, having already reached thousands of signatures from those who disagree with the privatisation proposals.

If it does go ahead, it will be the biggest privatisation of a company since Royal Mail in 2013. 

Further plans will be mentioned in the Queen’s speech next month.

Reps for Anna Richardson have been contacted for comment.